<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://imechanica.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>iMechanica - Parallel Computing in the Multi-Body System to Vehicle Dynamics? - Comments</title>
 <link>http://imechanica.org/node/2845</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Parallel Computing in the Multi-Body System to Vehicle Dynamics?&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Parallel Computing in the Multi-Body System to Vehicle Dynamics?</title>
 <link>http://imechanica.org/node/2845</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Has someone worked on the parallel computing in the multibody system to the vehicle dynamics? It&amp;#39;s what I am doing now. I am faced to make a choice, OpenMP or MPI? OpenMP is a little&amp;nbsp; easy to program, but with less portability. I prefer MPI and I think if it is a best choice to parallelize the constraint libraries, although it is a bit difficult to program. Am I right? Is anyone&amp;nbsp; also doing it now? Opinions and suggestions are welcome!
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Xianfeng Ye&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://imechanica.org/node/2845#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://imechanica.org/taxonomy/term/76">research</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 02:43:15 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Xianfeng Ye</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2845 at http://imechanica.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
