<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://imechanica.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>iMechanica - Want papers published, proposals granted and to be a good reviewer? Here is the key --- &amp;quot;Ten Simple Rules&amp;quot; series. - Comments</title>
 <link>http://imechanica.org/node/333</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Want papers published, proposals granted and to be a good reviewer? Here is the key --- &quot;Ten Simple Rules&quot; series.&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Useful but the not only method</title>
 <link>http://imechanica.org/node/333#comment-224</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;For the young researchers, this is helpful, because it gives a possible solution. While everyone has his own idea. I think learn from it but do not obey it .&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2006 06:45:25 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Y.L.Yang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 224 at http://imechanica.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>How to write a paper by Ashby</title>
 <link>http://imechanica.org/node/333#comment-227</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Zhigang, Whitesides short note on &amp;quot;how to write a paper&amp;quot; is nice. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www-mech.eng.cam.ac.uk/mmd/ashby-paper-V6.pdf&quot; title=&quot;Here&quot;&gt;Here&lt;/a&gt; is an analogous (somewhat longer) one from across the atlantic by Ashby. This is very good as well.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 16:10:49 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Pradeep Sharma</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 227 at http://imechanica.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Do not follow the guides bluntly!</title>
 <link>http://imechanica.org/node/333#comment-218</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;I have no doubt that it is important to organize a paper well. I am afraid, however, that the scientific journals can turn in scientific Yellow Pages with the over-dried essential information. Unfortunately, this scenario (to the large extent) is reality already. It&amp;#39;s a shame! Doing science is a very lively activity. Why should the reports look like dead bodies? The scientific texts should not be overloaded with jokes, of course, but they should bring a unique style of the authors. Such style may contradict the boring wisdom of the how-to-write guides but it can attract the readers. The latter is very important.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 04:35:52 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Konstantin Volokh</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 218 at http://imechanica.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Whitesides&#039;s &quot;Writing a Paper&quot; is a gem</title>
 <link>http://imechanica.org/node/333#comment-217</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I now require every student working with me to read it, and practice what it teaches.  Whitesides believes that writing paper is a way to direct a project, and writing should begin when the project begins.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 20:36:16 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Zhigang Suo</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 217 at http://imechanica.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Zhen,I enjoyed reading</title>
 <link>http://imechanica.org/node/333#comment-216</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Zhen,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I enjoyed reading these three articles! In particular, the last one---10 simple rules for reviewers---is quite instructive for young and old researchers alike. I wish more of us pay heed to it!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 20:26:38 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Pradeep Sharma</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 216 at http://imechanica.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Want papers published, proposals granted and to be a good reviewer? Here is the key --- &quot;Ten Simple Rules&quot; series.</title>
 <link>http://imechanica.org/node/333</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Getting papers published and getting proposals granted are often great challeges for young researchers, let alone being a good reviewer.  The &amp;quot;Ten Simple Rules&amp;quot; series by P.E. Bourne, L.M. Chalupa, and A. Korngreen delineate what we should follow.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://compbiol.plosjournals.org/archive/1553-7358/1/5/pdf/10.1371_journal.pcbi.0010057-L.pdf&quot;&gt;Ten simple rules for getting published&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://compbiol.plosjournals.org/archive/1553-7358/2/2/pdf/10.1371_journal.pcbi.0020012-L.pdf&quot;&gt;Ten simple rules for getting grants&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://compbiol.plosjournals.org/archive/1553-7358/2/2/pdf/10.1371_journal.pcbi.0020012-L.pdf&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://compbiol.plosjournals.org/archive/1553-7358/2/9/pdf/10.1371_journal.pcbi.0020110-S.pdf&quot;&gt;Ten simple rules for reviewers.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;More details about writing a good paper and proposal were also given by G. M.  Whitesides (&amp;quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://cedb.postech.ac.kr/~ecocat/wap.pdf&quot;&gt;writing a paper&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot;) and M.F. Ashby (&amp;quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www-mech.eng.cam.ac.uk/mmd/ashby-paper-V6.pdf&quot;&gt;how to write a paper&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot;). &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://imechanica.org/node/333#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://imechanica.org/taxonomy/term/77">opinion</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 14:31:26 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Zhen Zhang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">333 at http://imechanica.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
