<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://imechanica.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>iMechanica - How to develope a new potential function. - Comments</title>
 <link>http://imechanica.org/node/3437</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;How to develope a new potential function.&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Re: Developing interatomic/molecular potentials</title>
 <link>http://imechanica.org/node/3437#comment-8315</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Another way to go is to use &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Density_functional_theory&quot;&gt;density functional theory&lt;/a&gt;  and then coarse grain upwards in space and time.&amp;nbsp; An interesting &amp;quot;orbital-free&amp;quot; approach for calculating the electronic properties of materials has been proposed in a recent paper :&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;quot;&lt;em&gt;Introducing PROFESS: a new program for orbital-free density functional theory calculations&lt;/em&gt;&amp;quot;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
by
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Gregory S. Ho&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&amp;amp;_udi=B6TJ5-4T19434-1&amp;amp;_user=1526842&amp;amp;_rdoc=1&amp;amp;_fmt=&amp;amp;_orig=search&amp;amp;_sort=d&amp;amp;view=c&amp;amp;_acct=C000053548&amp;amp;_version=1&amp;amp;_urlVersion=0&amp;amp;_userid=1526842&amp;amp;md5=951073579bb9fb6947e304e3d4f6cf82#aff001&quot;&gt;a&lt;/a&gt;, Vincent L. Lign&amp;egrave;res&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&amp;amp;_udi=B6TJ5-4T19434-1&amp;amp;_user=1526842&amp;amp;_rdoc=1&amp;amp;_fmt=&amp;amp;_orig=search&amp;amp;_sort=d&amp;amp;view=c&amp;amp;_acct=C000053548&amp;amp;_version=1&amp;amp;_urlVersion=0&amp;amp;_userid=1526842&amp;amp;md5=951073579bb9fb6947e304e3d4f6cf82#aff001&quot;&gt;a&lt;/a&gt; and Emily A. Carter
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00104655&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Computer Physics Communications&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.sciencedirect.com/scidirimg/clear.gif&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; width=&quot;1&quot; height=&quot;10&quot; /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2008.07.002&quot; target=&quot;doilink&quot;&gt;doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2008.07.002&lt;/a&gt; .
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
For an example of how to move from a DFT calculation to a potential, see&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;&lt;em&gt;Combined Density Functional Theory and Interatomic Potential Study of the Bulk and Surface Structures and Properties of the Iron Sulfide Mackinawite (FeS)&lt;/em&gt;&amp;quot;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
by
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
A. J. Devey,*  R. Grau-Crespo,  and   N. H. de Leeuw ,
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
J. Phys. Chem. C, 112 (29), 10960&amp;ndash;10967, 2008. &lt;a href=&quot;http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp8001959&quot;&gt;doi:10.1021/jp8001959&lt;/a&gt;.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
-- Biswajit
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 20:05:17 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Biswajit Banerjee</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 8315 at http://imechanica.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The last sentence is very important!</title>
 <link>http://imechanica.org/node/3437#comment-8026</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;font size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
This process will take a long time, but the returns are usually good if&lt;br /&gt;
your potential describes a large group of atomic systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/font&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 01:09:19 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>RoozbehSanaei</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 8026 at http://imechanica.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Atomic Chemistry</title>
 <link>http://imechanica.org/node/3437#comment-8013</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Developing a potential, to put it simply (real simply), is a two-step process.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
First, you require a potential form.&amp;nbsp; This refer to the general potential expression,&amp;nbsp;usually containing potential parameters and interatomic separation/bond angle&amp;nbsp;housed in mathematical expressions.&amp;nbsp; The form depends on the type of atomic bond that you are looking at.&amp;nbsp; The form therefore describes the characteristic of the atomic bond, based upon first-principles approximation like the Born-Oppenheimer or tight-binding method.&amp;nbsp; This is the most difficult part for potential formulation and you need background in atomic chemistry to achieve this.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Second, when you have the form, you shall fit the parameters to physical properties.&amp;nbsp; It is usually not possible to fit a potential to&amp;nbsp;all physical properties,&amp;nbsp;as the number of potential parameters will usually be less than the total number of independent physical properties related to that material.&amp;nbsp; We usually perform specific fit to a limited number of crucial properties like lattice parameter, phonon dispersion,&amp;nbsp;bond energy, bulk modulus etc.&amp;nbsp; Then be very careful in analyzing the output from the simulation, by avoiding the computation of properties that we did not perform parameter&amp;nbsp;fitting on.&amp;nbsp; This is a relatively simpler process and you require experitise in mathematical manipulation and some knowledge on thermodynamics and mechanics of materials.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
You may try reading some literatures on potential formulation like the &lt;a href=&quot;http://prola.aps.org/abstract/PRL/v50/i17/p1285_1&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;EAM for metals&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://prola.aps.org/abstract/PRB/v31/i8/p5262_1&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Stillinger-Weber for Si&lt;/a&gt; and the more sophisticated &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.iop.org/EJ/abstract/0953-8984/18/29/003&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;ZnO potential formulation&lt;/a&gt;.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
This process will take a long time, but the returns are usually good if your potential describes a large group of atomic systems.&amp;nbsp; Good luck.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Adrian KSJ
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 21:08:09 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Adrian S. J. Koh</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 8013 at http://imechanica.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>QM/MM</title>
 <link>http://imechanica.org/node/3437#comment-8006</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;font size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;You can use Quantom mechanics to find your suitable potential function. your question is too general. you can use even open source softwares in this regard. QM/MM is more accurate but harder answer. &lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 12:18:37 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>RoozbehSanaei</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 8006 at http://imechanica.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>It&#039;s a very hard question</title>
 <link>http://imechanica.org/node/3437#comment-8002</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
It&amp;#39;s a very hard question to answer. You can easily become famous&lt;br /&gt;
and popular for deveoping a new, accurate, transferrable, and&lt;br /&gt;
easy-to-use force field. &lt;img src=&quot;http://imechanica.org/modules/tinymce/includes/jscripts/tiny_mce/plugins/emotions/images/smiley-laughing.gif&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; alt=&quot;Laughing&quot; title=&quot;Laughing&quot; /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Well,&lt;br /&gt;
first, it depends on what kind of materials you are interested in:&lt;br /&gt;
metals, polymers, glasses, ceramics, molecular materials - they all&lt;br /&gt;
have different function forms. Then do literature search to find&lt;br /&gt;
relevant papers and start from there.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
You may start from a generic force field and adjust some parameters to fit better for your purpose.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Again, it&amp;#39;s not easy but definitely a very important topic in MD simulations.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 10:21:13 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Lianqing Zheng</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 8002 at http://imechanica.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>How to develope a new potential function.</title>
 <link>http://imechanica.org/node/3437</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
How to develope a new potential function.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
For instance, if I want to study a new material system by classical MD,&amp;nbsp;for which the existing potential force fields are not suitable.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
I would like to know the standard procedure, how to use the first principle studies/ experimental data and how to select the basic functions...from the experts in this area.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Prasad MVD
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://imechanica.org/node/3437#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://imechanica.org/taxonomy/term/76">research</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 04:32:04 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>prasad_nano</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3437 at http://imechanica.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
