<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://imechanica.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>iMechanica - Shear Locking vs. Membrane Locking? - Comments</title>
 <link>http://imechanica.org/node/4031</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Shear Locking vs. Membrane Locking?&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Shear Locking vs. Membrane Locking</title>
 <link>http://imechanica.org/node/4031#comment-8889</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Dear Sacheen,
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Membrane locking&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Membrane locking does only occur in curved beam and shell elements. The term describes a&lt;br /&gt;
stiffening effect that occurs if pure bending deformations (&amp;ldquo;inextensional bending&amp;rdquo;) are accompanied&lt;br /&gt;
by parasitic membrane stresses. It is sometimes confused with shear locking and&lt;br /&gt;
volumetric locking because these effect the membrane part of shell elements. However, they&lt;br /&gt;
are completely different phenomena.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
As membrane locking is associated with the curvature of a structure it only occurs if the elements&lt;br /&gt;
are actually curved. For instance in the analysis of a cylindrical shell with four-node&lt;br /&gt;
elements there is no membrane locking when the mesh is aligned to the edges of the shell,&lt;br /&gt;
because the individual elements are flat. Linear triangles are always free from membrane&lt;br /&gt;
locking because they are always flat, regardless of the shape of the shell. Quadratic and biquadratic&lt;br /&gt;
elements usually show strong membrane locking in any situation.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;Shear locking&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Shear locking can occur in 2d and 3d solid elements as well as shell elements. The effect is&lt;br /&gt;
significant only if there is a certain (in-plane) &amp;ldquo;bending&amp;rdquo; deformation of the structure.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
From a mathematical point of view, shear locking is not existent. Looking at the corresponding&lt;br /&gt;
differential equation, there is no ill-conditioning or &amp;ldquo;small parameter&amp;rdquo;. Actually, the critical&lt;br /&gt;
parameter in the case of shear locking is the aspect ratio of the element (i.e. no property of&lt;br /&gt;
the underlying mathematical problem itself). This can be understood most easily with the help&lt;br /&gt;
of an analogy to the Timoshenko beam element. The aspect ratio of a 2d solid element has the&lt;br /&gt;
same effect on the stiffness matrix as the length-to-thickness ratio in the beam element.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.st.bv.tum.de/content/teaching/afem/afem.html&quot;&gt;Further information&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Martin J. Gross&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.matfem.com&quot;&gt;www.matfem.de&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 04:03:27 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Martin J. Gross</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 8889 at http://imechanica.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Shear Locking vs. Membrane Locking?</title>
 <link>http://imechanica.org/node/4031</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Could anyone briefly explain what is the difference between &amp;quot;Shear Locking&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Membrane Locking&amp;quot;. Does this apply to plain strain elements?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;Thank you.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://imechanica.org/node/4031#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://imechanica.org/taxonomy/term/76">research</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 14:51:04 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Sacheen Bekah</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">4031 at http://imechanica.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
