<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://imechanica.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>iMechanica - cyclic loading - Comments</title>
 <link>http://imechanica.org/taxonomy/term/1551</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;cyclic loading&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Convergence</title>
 <link>http://imechanica.org/node/2331#comment-7455</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m running a model with solid elements and concrete damage plasticity model.&amp;nbsp; I&amp;#39;m having problems with convergence as I make my geometry more complex.&amp;nbsp; I&amp;#39;ve modeled a slab and I-girder as one solid element to model a monolithic connection between the girder and slab.&amp;nbsp; When I run the same model with only a concrete slab the model runs fine and will converge.&amp;nbsp; But once I redo the geometry and include the girder with the slab the model does converge after a fraction of the previous model.&amp;nbsp; Any suggestions on what to change?&amp;nbsp; I&amp;#39;m using the Riks method to solve the iterations.&amp;nbsp; I&amp;#39;m trying to end with Force vs. Displacement diagrams for the model.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 10:34:33 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Zach Thiemann</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 7455 at http://imechanica.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Need Help</title>
 <link>http://imechanica.org/node/2331#comment-6168</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;How U define the concrete plasticity in abaqus?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 08:14:15 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>m_meisam</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 6168 at http://imechanica.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Explicit vs Standard</title>
 <link>http://imechanica.org/node/2331#comment-5905</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you for the interest shown Mr. Wang. I will run an Standard analyses to see the differences.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 02:47:20 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Gabriel Sas</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 5905 at http://imechanica.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>why do you want to use Explicit for quasi-static?</title>
 <link>http://imechanica.org/node/2331#comment-5904</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;span&gt;&lt;font size=&quot;3&quot;&gt;You need a good control to eliminate inertia effects. Any accumulated error will become stress wave in the model. Try Standard which has stringent convergence criterion.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 22:07:33 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Mingji Wang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 5904 at http://imechanica.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
