<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://imechanica.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>iMechanica - subversion - Comments</title>
 <link>http://imechanica.org/taxonomy/term/1680</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;subversion&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>SVN works well with plain</title>
 <link>http://imechanica.org/node/2482#comment-6386</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
SVN works well with plain text files. It can&amp;#39;t generate binary diff. Binary diffs are not that easy to create and manage. And often the binary diff size is much higher than a normal text file diff. Some specialised tool, xDelta (&lt;a href=&quot;http://xdelta.org/&quot; title=&quot;http://xdelta.org/&quot;&gt;http://xdelta.org/&lt;/a&gt;), can generate binary diff.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
SVN may work well with latest doc files which are xml based. But the older doc files are binary files and are not directly manageable by SVN.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
You may use in-built version management system of MS Word. Read the following article-
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://support.microsoft.com/kb/305216/en-us&quot; title=&quot;http://support.microsoft.com/kb/305216/en-us&quot;&gt;http://support.microsoft.com/kb/305216/en-us&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
--&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Biplab
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://biplab.in&quot; title=&quot;http://biplab.in&quot;&gt;http://biplab.in&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 00:37:34 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>biplab</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 6386 at http://imechanica.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>That is handy Biswajit,</title>
 <link>http://imechanica.org/node/2482#comment-6322</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;That is handy Biswajit, thanks. I am in the same boat with you Mark and I have to work with teams who still cannot leave MS Word. I find the doc only medium bland and a non-differentiator for sales. If they were open to at least use Google Docs things would be a lot more efficient but that still leaves the medium.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I created an app with Ruby on Rails called Honeypitch to be able to have teams collaborate and embed video, slideshows, Google spreadsheets, and more so I do not have to send 4 separate documents. It was designed for in house use then we had developers make it available for others.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The TortouseSVN tip is handy and I will share this with the team I work with who is afraid to use anything other than MS Word. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;James&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;----&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Proposal Automation and Sales Collaboration: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Mashup Your Passion with Honeypitch&amp;quot;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href=&quot;#mce_temp_url#&quot;&gt;http://www.honeypitch.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 23:54:47 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jaztuck</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 6322 at http://imechanica.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re: Proposal collaboration and subversion</title>
 <link>http://imechanica.org/node/2482#comment-6311</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Mark,
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
I&amp;#39;m a Unix and LaTeX person myself and Subversion has served me well.&amp;nbsp; However, I&amp;#39;ve heard that you can use the MS-WIndows version of subversion (called &lt;a href=&quot;http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;TortoiseSVN&lt;/a&gt; ) for dealing with Word documents reasonably well.  You could try out the instructions at Tips and Tricks on &lt;a href=&quot;http://newgeeks.blogspot.com/2006/08/word-document-management-using-svn.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Word document management using SVN&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp; I wonder well that works when multiple people are commiting changes simultaneously.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
-- Biswajit&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 15:26:58 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Biswajit Banerjee</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 6311 at http://imechanica.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>proposal collaboration</title>
 <link>http://imechanica.org/node/2482#comment-6310</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Biswajit,
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;I am always looking for better ways to collaborate on proposals. I could see LaTex and SVN working well together, but what can you do with MSWord? A recent experience with GoogleDocs convinced me that it was not quite ready for what I wanted to do (figures, automatic labeling/numbering, etc). How did you collaborate with SVN? I find it hard to beat tracked changes in MSWord, but it is still best to work serially and not in parallel ...
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;thanks, mark
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 12:56:21 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Mark E. Walter</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 6310 at http://imechanica.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Subversion</title>
 <link>http://imechanica.org/node/2482#comment-6167</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Nice history of Subversion.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 02:48:47 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Elizabeth M Kallman</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 6167 at http://imechanica.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Re;Subversion</title>
 <link>http://imechanica.org/node/2482#comment-6159</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Sukumar,
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The user interfaces for cvs and svn are identical (almost) though the internals are slightly different.&amp;nbsp; Once you have created a repository, the same basic commands apply.&amp;nbsp; For instance, instead of &amp;quot;cvs checkout&amp;quot; you have &amp;quot;svn checkout&amp;quot; to check out a copy of the code.&amp;nbsp; Similarly, &amp;quot;cvs add&amp;quot; becomes &amp;quot;svn add&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;cvs commit&amp;quot; becomes &amp;quot;svn commit&amp;quot;, &amp;quot;cvs update&amp;quot; becomes &amp;quot;svn update&amp;quot;, and &amp;quot;cvs diff&amp;quot; becomes &amp;quot;svn diff&amp;quot;.&amp;nbsp; The versioning is a bit more fine grained in svn (with every new commit leading to an update of the version).
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The main benefit of svn over cvs (that I see) is that a new repository is very easy to create with svn and new trunks can be easily spawned off from a tree.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; If you already know cvs you will only need to learn a few more rarely used commands to get going.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
-- Biswajit&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 15:41:33 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Biswajit Banerjee</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 6159 at http://imechanica.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Subversion . . .</title>
 <link>http://imechanica.org/node/2482#comment-6157</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Biswajit,
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Thanks a lot for the introduction and pointers on version control. I do use codes that are maintained under CVS and can definitely see the benefits of the same for code maintenance, apart from the ability for a large number of developers to easily work on the same code. Without CVS/subversion, this becomes a non-trivial and error-prone exercise. Hopefully, sooner than later, I will learn and adopt subversion in some of my own code development endeavors, and the links you have provided would be useful to get started.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 22:29:48 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>N. Sukumar</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 6157 at http://imechanica.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
