<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://imechanica.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>iMechanica - Berendsen - Comments</title>
 <link>http://imechanica.org/taxonomy/term/2550</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Berendsen&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>What MD program do you use?</title>
 <link>http://imechanica.org/node/3426#comment-7970</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
What MD program do you use? If it&amp;#39;s home-made,&amp;nbsp; you need to do&lt;br /&gt;
some coding (of course, know the theory first). Langevin dynamics can&lt;br /&gt;
be found everywhere: any MD book, or simply google.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Also, if possible, try to thermostat the atoms in the outer layer .
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 10:20:49 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Lianqing Zheng</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 7970 at http://imechanica.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Using Langevin thermostat..how can I..</title>
 <link>http://imechanica.org/node/3426#comment-7969</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Prasad MVD&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 10:11:55 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>prasad_nano</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 7969 at http://imechanica.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Langevin</title>
 <link>http://imechanica.org/node/3426#comment-7968</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Try Langevin dynamics. It&amp;#39;s probably the best thermostat for small systems.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 09:40:52 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Lianqing Zheng</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 7968 at http://imechanica.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Questions for you</title>
 <link>http://imechanica.org/node/3426#comment-7958</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Hi Prasad,
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
I have performed MD simulations on NVT ensembles.&amp;nbsp; I need to clarify the&lt;br /&gt;
following with you:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
1.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Exactly how&amp;nbsp;many atoms did you thermostated?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
2.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; How did you take care of the kinematics of the atoms at the interface&lt;br /&gt;
between the thermostated and un-thermostated atomic layers?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
3.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; I think you are aware that, by partially thermostating your CNT, you are&lt;br /&gt;
handling an MD problem with mixed ensembles (NVT &amp;amp; NVE).&amp;nbsp; Hybrid&lt;br /&gt;
ensembles&amp;nbsp;frequently leads to incorrect physical properties inferred from the&lt;br /&gt;
atomic data.&amp;nbsp; Did you account for the mixed ensemble in the statistical&lt;br /&gt;
mechanical sense?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
4.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; I gather that you are trying to obtain a target temperature for the&lt;br /&gt;
entire CNT by thermostating two-thirds of the CNT.&amp;nbsp; Correct&amp;nbsp;me if I am wrong.&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
But if I read it correctly, may I ask, why are you doing&amp;nbsp;this?&amp;nbsp; It didn&amp;#39;t seem&lt;br /&gt;
physically possible to thermostat a part of the problem and expect the entire&lt;br /&gt;
problem to approach the targeted temperature.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Thank you.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Adrian KSJ
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 21:51:57 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Adrian S. J. Koh</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 7958 at http://imechanica.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
