User login

Navigation

You are here

Abaqus Problem

Normal
0

false
false
false

EN-US
X-NONE
AR-SA

/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin-top:0in;
mso-para-margin-right:0in;
mso-para-margin-bottom:8.0pt;
mso-para-margin-left:0in;
line-height:107%;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;
mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;
mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;}

Dears,

I would like to thanks you in advance for any help.

My problem is that I am modeling a T-Girder bridge reinforced concrete beam under a cyclic load in Abaqus. I modeled the reinforcement as an embedded (truss elements) elements inside the concrete elements 8-node brick elements. I used the concrete damage plasticity to model the concrete with concrete compression hardening (stress-strain curve )and concrete compression damage for the compression case, for the tension case I used the concrete tension stiffening (stress-strain curve) with the tension damage. For the steel I used the plastic model to inter the stress-strain curve for the steel. I used the dilation angle equal to 38deg, eccentricity equal 0.1., K=0.667, and the stress ratio =1.12.

My problem is that the behavior of the girder that I am modeling is stiffer and the initial stiffness of the Abaqus model is a lot higher than the experimental initial stiffness. Also the model strength in general is higher than the experimental strength. I tried also to model a reinforced concrete column under a cyclic load and the same results pop-up (higher initial stiffness and higher strength).

I would be grateful for any help in this problem.

Thanks in advance.

Subscribe to Comments for "Abaqus Problem"

Recent comments

More comments

Syndicate

Subscribe to Syndicate