You are here
Susmel-Papuga sharp controversy about multiaxial fatigue criteria
I recently came across this sharp controversy between Papuga and Susmel on multiaxial fatigue criteria. Papuga accuses Susmel of "picking up" data that he likes from the literature, disregarding other data... And of having some constants in the criteria that are set a posteriori as fitting parameters. Do you know how this ended up? Anyone else partecipated to the debate?