Essays and books on writing well
- G. M. Whitesides, Writing a paper. Advanced Materials 15, 1375-1377, 2004. This three-page essay by a prolific professor at Harvard advocates a process: start writing a paper at the same time you start a research project. Every thinking person should read this essay, and give the process a try.
- Elements of style, Nature Physics 3, 581 (2007). This is a one-page editorial on writing, more relevant to writing short papers such as those in Nature, Science, PNAS, PRL, APL. You may also want to read an iMechanica entry on writing for PRL by Zhenyu Zhang.
- M.F. Ashby, How to write a paper. Professor Ashby, of the University of Cambridge, is known to many of us for his textbooks, and materials selection maps. He is a fascinating speaker and writer. This essay explains how he approaches writing.
- W. Strunk and E.B. White, The Elements of Style. This little book is perhaps the best known book on writing well.
- W.K. Zinsser, On Writing Well. A delightful and helpful book.
- J.M. Williams, Style: Toward Clarity and Grace. Written by a Professor of English, this book takes a more systematic approach to the craft. My favorite.
If you find any helpful essays and books on writing well, please add a link below.
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| Nature physics elements of style.pdf | 136.25 KB |
»
- Zhigang Suo's blog
- Login or register to post comments
- 7683 reads
Writing resources
Dear Prof. Suo:
Here are a few resources on writing that I have found:
A handy URL
We often get confused as to how to write the SI units properly. (As recently as a couple of days back, I certainly did!) For example, how should we express force? Select one:
(a) 10 Newtons
(b) 10 newtons
(c) 10 newton
If you didn't answer (c), you certainly need to check out the following check-list. (Even otherwise, it would prove useful.) Maintained by the Physics Lab of NIST, it's authoritative: http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Units/checklist.html. The homepage of the concerned URL gives free access to other related information too.
How to publish?
This link is a quit good place I have seen in the website to teach you how to publish a paper in the top journal. Please enjoy it!
http://www.roie.org/how.htm
Nature Physics Editorial on writing good papers
This one-page editorial is available by open access.
I am in TOTAL DISAGREEMENT !!! Automatic paper generator?
Start writing a research paper when ? At the
same time you start a research project. Every thinking person should
read this essay, and give the process a try.? This is crazy!!! Why not then BEFORE you start a research project?
The decline and the final corruption will be definitive when we never start ANY research project, and we just engage ourselves to write papers!
When then a ROBOT to write papers? WhAutomatic paper generator?
You should write a paper WHEN YOU HAVE SOMETHING TO SAY!!
M. Whitesides, sorry, but I am in TOTAL DISAGREEMENT! Maybe you are a prolific professor, but how cited?
Of course you can make a good career still for some few years with this method, but not for long:
Read instead
And read why Google Scholar will silently stop this crazyness
Scientometrics
Vol: 74, Issue: 2, February 2008
pp. 273 - 294
Title:
Sources of Google Scholar citations outside the Science Citation Index: A comparison between four science disciplines
Authors:
Kousha, Kayvanb, a; Thelwall, Mikeb, a
Affiliations:
b. University of Tehran, Department of Library and Information Science, Jalal-Al-e-Ahmed Ave.
P.O. Box 11455/6456
Tehran
Iran
a. University of Wolverhampton, School of Computing and Information Technology, Wolverhampton
UK
Abstract (English):
For
practical reasons, bibliographic databases can only contain a subset of
the scientific literature. The ISI citation databases are designed to
cover the highest impact scientific research journals as well as a few
other sources chosen by the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI).
Google Scholar also contains citation information, but includes a less
quality controlled collection of publications from different types of
web documents. We define Google Scholar unique citations as those
retrieved by Google Scholar which are not in the ISI database. We took
a sample of 882 articles from 39 open access ISI-indexed journals in
2001 from biology, chemistry, physics and computing and classified the
type, language, publication year and accessibility of the Google
Scholar unique citing sources. The majority of Google Scholar unique
citations (70%) were from full-text sources and there were large
disciplinary differences between types of citing documents, suggesting
that a wide range of non-ISI citing sources, especially from
non-journal documents, are accessible by Google Scholar. This might be
considered to be an advantage of Google Scholar, since it could be
useful for citation tracking in a wider range of open access scholarly
documents and to give a broader type of citation impact. An important
corollary from our study is that Google Scholar’s wider coverage of
Open Access (OA) web documents is likely to give a boost to the impact
of OA research and the OA movement.
MIT students are very clever and understood it all long ago
Automatic Paper Generator
A group of MIT students wrote a computer program capable of creating "random Computer Science research papers, including graphs, figures, and citations."
They then used this program to create a paper that they submitted to an
academic conference: the World Multi-Conference on Systemics,
Cybernetics and Informatics, which sounds like a thrill a minute. The paper was accepted, which isn't really surprising since as the students point out conferences such as this are really 'fake' conferences "with no quality standards, which exist only to make money." The students hope to travel down to the conference (if they're still allowed to attend) and deliver a "completely randomly-generated talk."
Posted By: Alex | Date: Thu Apr 14, 2005 | Permalink |
Total Comments: 5
Category:
Literature/Language,
Science
If you've been to any
academic conferences, or tried to read many academic journals, you'll
swear that most of the content is ramdomly generated.
I remember once my graduate school convened a panel discussion on how
to get published in journals. Suffering, as usual, from a terminal lack
of tact, I stood up and said, "Isn't it true that many of these
journals have few or no readers, and that if professors didn't need to
publish in order to get tenure, they wouldn't exist at all?"
To my amazement, none of panelists denied this claim (all the panelists
were editors of, and major contributors to, academic journals). One of
them offered the justification that, "At least my articles will be
there in the university libraries if anyone in the future should ever
want to read them."
Posted by Big Gary C in Dallas, Texas on Fri Apr 15, 2005 at 01:17 PM