Skip to main content

hookes law

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on

why the stifffness matrix is foutrh order ?

Chad Landis

In reply to by suman (not verified)

I guess the trivial answer is that the stiffness tensor gives a linear relationship between two second rank tensors, the stress and the strain, and hence is a fourth rank tensor.  Similarly, dielectric permittivity relates to vectors (first rank tensors) and hence is a second rank tensor, piezoelectricity relates strain (2nd) to electric field (1st) and is a 3rd rank tensor.  One last example is thermal expansion, a second rank tensor, relating strain (2nd) to the scalar temperature (0th).  Does this answer your question?

Chad

Tue, 03/31/2009 - 13:13 Permalink
suman (not verified)

In reply to by Chad Landis

left hand side of the hook's law is the stress tensor (2 rank)is equal to product of stiffness tensor(4th rank) and strain tensor(2 rank).in the tensor multiplication , the stiffness tensor and the strain tensor the resulting stress tensor rank should br 4+2 that means 6 rank. how can you explain i went wrong?

 

Tue, 03/31/2009 - 15:58 Permalink
Chad Landis

In reply to by suman (not verified)

The tensor operation you are referring to does not "expand" the rank of the resulting tensor, but rather "contracts" the rank.  This is analogous to standard matrix operations in linear algebra, a 3x1 vector = a 3x3 matrix dotted with another 3x1 vector.  This is similar to the dot product of two vectors being equal to a scalar.
Tue, 03/31/2009 - 16:20 Permalink

For a brief explanation of the thermodynamic basis of Hooke's law see

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hooke's_law

To expand upon Chad's explanation, a "linear" relationship between stress and strain means a 9 relations of the form:

sigma_{ij} = A_{ij1} eps_11 + A_{ij2}  eps_12 + A_{ij3} eps_13 +

                   A_{ij4} eps_21 + A_{ij5}  eps_22 + A_{ij6} eps_23 +

                   A_{ij7} eps_31 + A_{ij8}  eps_32 + A_{ij9} eps_33  

where i, j = 1,2,3.  We can make the expressions more compact by writing A_{ijM}, M=1 to 9 as A_{ijkl}, k, l = 1 to 3.  So we have a relation of the form

sigma_{ij} = A_{ijkl} eps_{kl} 

The quantity A looks like a fourth order tensor.  The question then is: how do we know that A actually is a tensor? 

Since a tensor is a physical quantity, the quantity itself should not change if the coordinate system is changed.  However, the components of the tensor in a particular coordinate system may change.  Strict transformation rules apply for changes from one coordinate system to another.

In this case, the rule for a fourth-order tensor is (for a Cartesian coordinate system with summation implied over repeated indices)

T'_ijkl = Q_{im} Q_{jn} Q_{pk} Q_{ql} T_{mnpq}

Doing the algebra shows that the tensor A is indeed a fourth-order tensor.

-- Biswajit 

Tue, 03/31/2009 - 20:59 Permalink
Chad Landis

In reply to by suman (not verified)

The "product" that they are referring to here is some type of dyad product.  Hooke's law involves an inner product.  In component form a dyad product of two vectors looks like:

A_ij = B_i C_j

while the inner product looks like

A = summation over i of B_i C_i

In the first case, a second rank tensor was created by the dyad product of two first rank tensors, while in the second case a scalar (rank zero) was obtained from the inner product (dot product) of two vectors. 

Wed, 04/01/2009 - 20:22 Permalink
suman (not verified)

thank sir , it is my mistake in unterstanding,sir.always masters are really masters,i am a newbie

Wed, 04/01/2009 - 20:32 Permalink