You are here
aeroelastic of blade with abaqus
hello
i have a problem,i am trying it about one years
is:aeroelastic blade of helicopter with abaqus
i find some method for solution:
1.using abaqus for 2D ANALYSIS of cross section(meshed cross section) and then 1D modal analysis modal,then using ZAERO for aerodynamic load,my problem in case is:linking abaqus and zaero.what is solutin method?
2.using abaqus for 2D ANALYSIS of cross section(meshed cross section) and then 1D modal analysis modal,then writing aerodynamic code ,my problem in case is relating structure with aerodynamic.
by python?or by subrotine(WICH SUBROTINE?)?or by other thing?
3.using abaqus for 2D ANALYSIS of cross section(meshed cross section) for extarcting of material cofficents ,...,and then using result (extracted with 2D analysis with abaqus) in code(writied for structure &AERODYNAMIC LOAD ,??
4.using VABS(http://hifi-comp.com/default.aspx)for 2D ANALYSIS of cross section(meshed cross section) for extarcting of material cofficents ,...,and then using result (extracted with 2D analysis with abaqus) in code(writied for structure &AERODYNAMIC LOAD ,??
3 IS BETTER OR 4?
PLEASE HELP ME,DO I USE ,WICH ONE?1?2?3?4?
PLEASE SAY ME,YOUR EXOERIENCE ABOUT AEROELASTIC OF BLDE.
HELP ME,HELP
- attash3099's blog
- Log in or register to post comments
- 5176 reads
Comments
I am glad to know that you
I am glad to know that you are aware of VABS . The blade propeties calculated by VABS is the best, and ABAQUS sectional analysis capability is nowhere comparable to VABS. We had a chart to compare these two: http://hifi-comp.com/Documents/ABAQUSvsVABS_CrossSectionalCapabilities.pdf . If you happen to analyze the same section with two approaches, you will find the differencce.