You are here
Joining a discussion on Linear Algebra
Wed, 2014-01-01 04:17 - Vlado A. Lubarda
I read with interest an excellent discussion about Linear Algebra in Mechanics. I am attaching Chapter I: Tensor Preliminaries from my book Elastoplasticity Theory, which includes Hill's analysis of induced tensors mentioned in the discussion.
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
Lubarda-Tensor Preliminaries.pdf | 162.4 KB |
»
- Vlado A. Lubarda's blog
- Log in or register to post comments
- 6851 reads
Comments
Re: Joining a discussion on Linear Algebra
Happy new year, Vlado! Thank you so much for posting Chapter I of your book Elastoplasticity Theory. I really like your book. It's modern and comprehensive, covering many difficult aspects of our field. It is also very pedagogical.
In the chapter you posted here, you have developed tensors using dyads. Several other approaches have been mentioned in the two recent threads:
Here is a list of the approaches mentioned:
I believe that approaches 1-3 are equivalent. Approach 4 is a natural generalization of 3, but is perhaps too general for common applications in mechanics.
Now saying that approaches 1-3 are equivalent overlooks one significant aspect: they look different. We need to teach and students need to learn. Which approach is good for learning a subject for the first time or second time? Should we learn them all?
The experience of teachers and students is important. It will be useful if people can talk about their experience.
Vlado Lubarda Happy New
Vlado Lubarda
Happy New Year, Zhigang, and greetings from Europe.
I agree: it indeed helps that people can talk about their teaching experience. And imechanics is such a wonderful place for it.
I am returning to US on Sunday and we'll check my lecture notes on Continuum Mechanics. I have not thaught this course for several years, and we'll need to refresh about pedagogical and other details of the approach I used in the classroom, but I think that it involves or combines all three approaches you are referring above.
Best,
Vlado