Skip to main content

Explosion Engineering (MACE61054) Discussion Blog

Submitted by Henry Tan on

You are always invited to join our course discussions!

Topics for MACE 61054 Explosion Engineering

Topic: Physics of Explosions

Physics of Explosions – part I

Physics of Explosions – part II

Spalling and Fragmentation –I

Spalling and Fragmentation –II

Topic: High Energy Rate Processes

Energy Related Materials

Explosive Welding

Topic: Underwater Explosion 

Underwater Explosion -part I

Underwater Explosion -part II

Course summary

Tutorial questions

Tutorial solutions

 

Suggested topics for Explosion Engineering Projects

Directions for students registered for course unit: MACE 61054 Explosion Engineering

(1) Go to the website node/2979, and read the discussion topics and previous posts.

(2) Register (only once) at user/register

(3) Post you questions, comments.

    

From Prof. Ko van der Weele

A steel ball dropped onto loose, very fine sand creates an impressive jet: Upon impact, sand is blown away in all directions, forming a crown. The ball dives deep into the soft sand, creating a void (like a mine shaft) that immediately collapses again: the "hydrostatic" pressure focuses upon the axis of impact and pushes the sand straight up into the air. (from van der Weele's research website)

Wed, 04/02/2008 - 20:22 Permalink



From Rae PJ, Goldrein HT, Palmer SJP, Field JE, Lewis AL (2002) Quasi-static studies of the deformation and failure of beta-HMX based polymer bonded explosives. Proc R Soc Lond A458:743–762.

Optical micrograph of the post failure route in a high explosive suggests that macroscopic crack propagation is mainly along interfaces.

Wed, 04/02/2008 - 20:38 Permalink

A metal foam is a cellular structure consisting of a solid metal - frequently aluminum - containing a large volume fraction of gas-filled pores.

 



A large-cell closed-cell aluminium foam produced from molten aluminium by the Shinko Wire Company (sold under the trade name Alporas).





An open-cell aluminium foam produced by ERG Aerospace

Fri, 04/04/2008 - 13:35 Permalink

I put a lot of links to the internet figures, and the images show automatically. I do not want the pictures be treated as if they are generated by me. But, am I breaking any intellectual property laws by providing these links?

Tue, 04/08/2008 - 19:53 Permalink

 

I am sure that everyone is familiar with hot welding, which
is infact the ordinary welding where two metal forms a weld pool and on cooling
they will attach together. But in cold welding the melting of the two metals won’t
happen this has got lot of advantages because we can join materials which are
not weldable for eg, Powder metallurgy and ofcourse Explosive welding.

 

Thu, 04/10/2008 - 22:15 Permalink

With regards to a question on the surface finish of explosion welding in the last lecture  - it seems that some slight deformation must occur as the two layers are generally flattened after they have been explosively welded together. See www.dynamicmaterials.com/divisions/clad%20Metal%20Group/Explosion%20Wel…

The page also has a video of the explosion welding (although you cant see much)

Mon, 04/14/2008 - 10:09 Permalink

Firas Al-matook

how can we classified the type of underwater explosion if d/W1/3 is more than 1 and less than 16 because if it less than one is shallow and if it more than 16 classified as deep underwater explsosion.

  

Wed, 05/07/2008 - 14:57 Permalink
Henry Tan

In reply to by Firas

<1 (shallow) and > 16 (deep) are two extreme cases for underwater explosion. For those two cases, mathematically the controlling equations can be simplified, and physically they each share common behaviours.



For the cases in between, the behaviours are complicated. Taking an example for bubble dynamics:

(1)    for deep underwater explosion, the interactions between the bubble and the water surface can be ignored;

(2)    for shallow underwater explosion, bubble burst into the air quickly.

(3)    for >1 and < 16 underwater explosion, the interactions between bubble and the water surface need to be accounted for.

Thu, 05/08/2008 - 11:31 Permalink

Firas Al-matook

am hazitated to do flying impact analysis ( shock wave and Rankine-Hugoniot equations) on my dissertation topic despite of it is about Aluminium aircraft impacting a concrete rigid barrier with impact velocity. the reason why am hazitated that am assumed the density after impact remains the same as before during my experimenta analysis, i.e. no pentration or structure deformation though Hugoniot considers two densities.

plz Dr, if you can give me an advice to solve this issue, I would like to do it becous in real life the impact of aircraft with a rigid structure as what happened in WTC sustains obviously two different densities.

 many regards

FIRAS Al-MATOOK

MED

Manchester University

Mon, 07/21/2008 - 14:46 Permalink