Skip to main content

Does a scientist who has had three patents in the past five years, but only three papers, each cited just three times, deserve m

Submitted by Mike Ciavarella on
research
research
publications

From the blogosphere

Nature 453, x (2008). doi:10.1038/7196xc

Does a scientist who has had three patents in the past five years,
but only three papers, each cited just three times, deserve more
recognition than one with five Nature papers and 1,000 citations? 

 

Can anyone download the full paper I have no access to Nature!!!!