User login


You are here

RVE analysis without BCs and periodic mesh requirements

Wenbin Yu's picture

RVE analysis becomes a routine exercise in material modeling. Usually it is carried out using finite element codes such as ABAQUS or ANSYS. The main thing one should pay attention is to applying the right boundary conditions. It is settled that periodic boundary conditions are the preferred boundary conditions to be applied. The BCs are that u_i-\epsilon_{ij}x_j should be equal on the corresponding edges. This type of boundary conditions can be applied using coupled equations constraints. This requires that one creates a mesh with corresponding nodes on periodic edges. For real, complex microstructures, this could be a challenge. Another issue that with a 2D RVE analysis, one can only obtain in-plane properties and local fields, for 3D properties and local fields, 3D RVE analysis are always needed. Six 3D analyses are needed to compute the complete set of 3D elastic properties. Another analysis is needed to compute the local fields for each global state. 

A recently developed general-purpose multiscale constitutive modeling code called SwiftComp based on Mechanics of Structure Genome, can be used for micromechanics which is essentially a RVE analysis for dummies. The user does not have to specify the boundary conditions and periodic mesh is not required. All the user has to do is to provide the finite element mesh as input. Another unique feature of SwiftComp is that it can compute complete set of 3D properties from a 2D RVE if the material features 2D periodicity such as unidirectional fiber reinforced composites. All the properties are computed within one analysis and thus it is at least six times more efficient than traditional 3D RVE analysis. The code can be launched freely in the cloud at or used as a plugin for ABAQUS or ANSYS. You are welcome to try it to see the difference from the RVE analysis you are familiar with. 


Subscribe to Comments for "RVE analysis without BCs and periodic mesh requirements"

Recent comments

More comments


Subscribe to Syndicate