Skip to main content

XFEM vs Mesh free methods

Submitted by bruno-page on

I understand that the principle of XFEM is enrichment:

XFEM is a local partition of unity (PUM) enriched finite element method. By local, it means that only a region near

the discontinuities such as cracks, holes, material interfaces are enriched. The most important concept in this

method is "enrichment" which means that the displacement approximation is enriched (incorporated) by additional

problem-specific functions.

Similarly-what is the principle of mesh free methods?

I have no knowledge of mesh free methods.Is it that mesh-free means "element free"? Nodes would always be present

even in mesh free methods.Right?

Each node would be associated with a function "w1"??

How is the concept of "enrichment" applicable to mesh free methods?

Hi,

 You could refer this paper to know how PUM-based enrichment is done within meshless methods:

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6V0T-4RM1KTJ-…

 In that paper, a detailed description of how to program enriched meshless method, say EFG (element free galerkin) is also presented. A link to the download page is there too.

 

Sun, 03/29/2009 - 12:21 Permalink