Skip to main content

yield surface

Geometrically exact elastoplastic rods -determination of yield surface in terms of stress resultants

Submitted by Ajeet Kumar on

This work addresses the determination of yield surfaces for geometrically exact elastoplastic rods. Use is made of a formulation where the rod is subjected to an uniform strain field along its arc length, thereby reducing the elastoplastic problem of the full rod to just its cross-section. By integrating the plastic work and the stresses over the rod's cross-section, one then obtains discrete points of the yield surface in terms of stress resultants. Eventually, Lamé curves in their most general form are fitted to the discrete points by an appropriate optimisation method.

Concrete Damaged PLasticity - Effect of Kc

Submitted by aravindangokul on
Choose a channel featured in the header of iMechanica

I'm trying to develop yield surface of a material for a particular value of hydrostatic stress(since CDP model uses drucker-prager hypothesis).. In user manual, it is given that, for Kc value of 1, i should get a circle, and for Kc value of 0.667, i should get a shape of inverted triangle in deviatoric plane.. But I have tested for 3 values of Kc, 0.667, 0.9 and 1, for all, i'm getting the same inverted triangle in the deviatoric plane. 

*Concrete Damaged Plasticity 

22., 0.33, 1.16, 0.667, 0. 

Concrete Damaged PLasticity - Effect of Kc

Submitted by aravindangokul on

I'm trying to develop yield surface of a material for a particular value of hydrostatic stress(since CDP model uses drucker-prager hypothesis).. In user manual, it is given that, for Kc value of 1, i should get a circle, and for Kc value of 0.667, i should get a shape of inverted triangle in deviatoric plane.. But I have tested for 3 values of Kc, 0.667, 0.9 and 1, for all, i'm getting the same inverted triangle in the deviatoric plane. 



*Concrete Damaged Plasticity 

22., 0.33, 1.16, 0.667, 0. 



Evoution of Yield surfaces: Past and Future Trend - Part 3

Submitted by Amit Pandey on

 My last two posts on this series

Part- 1 (node/9016) and

Part- 2 (node/9073)

were mainly focussed on the tension–torsion (σ11–√3σ12) stress space. This paper will be the final post on this series and will focus mainly on the behavior of  both of these alloys under tension–tension (σ11σ22)space and conclude this ongoing research.

Abstract.