What Steps to be used to analyse a Monopile foundation(offshore)
Hi Everyone,
Hi Everyone,
ICAME 2013: Call for Papers, due 31 Jan 2013
28-29 August 2013, Malacca World Heritage City, MALAYSIA
click on:
http://www.malacca.ws/attractions/melaka-historic-cities.htm
Dear Colleagues,
On behalf of the organizing committee, I cordially invite your participation in Symposium on Wrinkled and Crumpled Membranes, as part of the 13th Pan-American Congress of Applied Mechanics (PACAM XIII), to be held in Houston, Texas, May 22-24, 2013.
Department of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering
University of Colorado, Boulder
The research objective is to establish an ultrastructurally-based computational finite element model of the ocular lens subjected to dynamic loading to attempt to better understand the mechanisms of traumatic cataract formation and how it may be treated clinically.
Hi, Every one i am student doing my masters and i have got the
experimental result from tensile test for different temperature stress vs strain and orthogonal cut .
but i am going to apply the Johnson cook material model. please can any
one give me how to find A,B,C,N and M please i have read it found from
the experimental data i have got but i didn't know how to find please
CSIRO division of Earth Science and Resource Engineering is seeking a Senior Research Scientist in hydraulic fracturing/geomechanics. The position is located in Melbourne, Australia and the successful candidate will play a leading role in a world class hydraulic fracturing laboratory facility and in a hydraulic fracturing research team that integrates modelling with experimentation at laboratory and field scales.
Hello everyone,
I am studying fracture of polymer composites.
I had a question I want to relate fracture toughness of composite to the composite stress-strain curve found from simple tensin test(on samples with no notch or pre-existing crack), can anyone give me a hint , how to do it?
Amit Acharya and Robin J. Knops
(to appear in Journal of Elasticity)
The common practice of ignoring the elastic strain gradient in measurements of geometrically necessary dislocation (GND) density is critically examined. It is concluded that the practice may result in substantial errors. Our analysis points to the importance of spatial variations of the elastic strain field in relation to its magnitude in inferring estimates of dislocation density from measurements.