Skip to main content

Blog posts

Probelm with Abaqus/Explicit

Submitted by Gouse on

Hi,




I am using cohesive elements to model the interface around a
circular inclusion. First I used Abaqus/standard I got proper results
but when I used same values with an amplitude curve (tabular, linearly
applied) to apply load quasi-statically in Abaqus/Explicit, I could not get a converged
solution. Field variables are oscillating and elements getting
distorted excessively. In Abaqus/Explicit I am applying load very
slowly but even though same problem persists.



Regards




Gouse 

LS DYNA User Defined Failure Criterion

Submitted by Kapil.Nandwana on

Hi:

 I am simulating a projectile impact on a plate and using LS - DYNA for the same. 

I have to use Barlat's anistropic plasticity model with the Johnson Cook Failure Criterion.

Now, Although Barlat's Model is in built into LS DYNA, how do I implement JC Failure criterion ? Is there a feature of User defined failure criterion in DYNA ?

If not, Is implementing a UMAT consisting of Barlat's consitutive eqn and JC failure criterion the only other option ?

 

Thank You,

  

 

 

 

Openings Available: Ph.D. students in MEMS/Nanotechnology

Submitted by tonyjunhuang on

The Penn State Biofunctionalized Nano-Electro-Mechanical-Systems (BioNEMS) Laboratory (http://www.esm.psu.edu/huang/) is actively recruiting highly motivated, qualified Ph.D. students. 

 

We welcome students trained in the following fields: Mechanical Engineering; Electrical Engineering; Chemical Engineering; Chemistry; Biology; Optics; Material Science; Bioengineering; Physics.

Outstanding Scientists : New Delhi (India)_ CSIR

Submitted by Amit Pandey on

 

Oppurtunity for experience scientist and professors at

Council of Scientific & Industrial Research [CSIR]:

 http://www.csir.res.in/

http://www.nature.com/naturejobs/science/jobs/93864-Outstanding-Scienti…

You have a mission back home in India

Symmetry of Infinitesimal (linear) strain tensor

Submitted by Jayadeep U. B. on

Hello everyone,

 Why do we have the infinitesimal (linear) strain tensor to be symmetric? The reasons, which I have understood so far are:

1. It is defined to be symmetric so that it behaves like a tensor.

2. The stress tensor, which is its energy conjugate, is symmetric, and hence the skew-symmetric part has no contribution towards strain energy.

 Can anyone suggest more fundamental reason(s) for the symmetry of linear strain tensor, like the moment equlibrium leading to symmetry of the Cauchy stress tensor?

Thanks in advance,

Functionally graded materials

Submitted by mrityunjay on

Hi 

 I am a new entrant to this site. I am a Ph.D student working in the area mechanical behavior of fgm's.

Is there anyone to support and share the knowledge in the domain of theorotical modelling for damping behavior of fgm beam?

I need to know about different laws (exponential, sigmoidal etcs) on fgm's. any literature?

mrityunjay