A poor but independent researcher from Pune, India, is in the middle of an embarrassment of the riches, of sorts --- [aka: what to do with my conference paper on my new approach to QM?]
Special note:
I have a request to make to physicists: Would they be willing to provide some informal feedback on my new approach to QM?
Update (2021.09.21 15:57 IST): There were unusually many blog hits for the document. ... I do like the work getting noticed, but still, I guess, a clarification is in order:
Hello, World
Here is a document that jots down, in a brief, point-wise manner, the elements of my new approach to understanding quantum mechanics.
Please note that the writing is very much at a preliminary stage. It is very much a work in progress. However, it does jot down many essential ideas.
I am uploading the document at iMechanica just to have an externally verifiable time-stamp to it. Further versions will also be posted at this thread.
Check out here [at my personal blog] [^] and the post before that.
---
Have a happy holiday season!
---
Sincerely,
--Ajit
|
WHAT |
Five-day short course on the fundamentals of continuum, atomistic and multiscale modeling of materials. |
|
WHO |
Prof. Ellad B. Tadmor (U. Minnesota, USA) and Prof. Ronald E. Miller (Carleton University, Canada). |
Hi all,
Just thought that the following paper archived at the arXiv yesterday could be of general interest to any mechanician:
Xingyu Zhang, Matthew Tomes, Tal Carmon (2011) "Precession optomechanics," arXiv:1104.4839 [^]
The fig. 1 in it makes the matter conceptually so simple that the paper can be recommended to any mechanician for his general reading, and not only to a specialist in the field.
--Ajit
[E&OE]
Welcome to the February 2009 issue. In this issue, we will discuss the use of finite elements (FEs) in quantum mechanics, with specific focus on the quantum-mechanical problem that arises in crystalline solids. We will consider the electronic structure theory based on the Kohn-Sham equations of density functional theory (KS-DFT): in real-space, Schrödinger and Poisson equations are solved in a parallelepiped unit cell with Bloch-periodic and periodic boundary conditions, respectively.
Does the word "randomness" have antonym? If yes, what is it? Why? What view of randomness does that imply?