I have a request to make to physicists: Would they be willing to provide some informal feedback on my new approach to QM?
Update (2021.09.21 15:57 IST): There were unusually many blog hits for the document. ... I do like the work getting noticed, but still, I guess, a clarification is in order:
https://twitter.com/stephanebordas/status/1368289311523827714 The University of Luxembourg (UL) invites applications for two PhD Fellow (Doctoral Candidate) positions (m/f) as part of the QuaC project funded by the FNR CORE funding instrument https://www.fnr.lu/funding-instruments/core/
Dear all,
An update on the http://www.legato-team.eu at work in the COVID19 response in Luxembourg.
Check out http://www.ariana-tech.com a joint venture between Kyoto and Luxembourg.
Hello, World
Here is a document that jots down, in a brief, point-wise manner, the elements of my new approach to understanding quantum mechanics.
Please note that the writing is very much at a preliminary stage. It is very much a work in progress. However, it does jot down many essential ideas.
I am uploading the document at iMechanica just to have an externally verifiable time-stamp to it. Further versions will also be posted at this thread.
Hi all,
Just thought that the following paper archived at the arXiv yesterday could be of general interest to any mechanician:
Xingyu Zhang, Matthew Tomes, Tal Carmon (2011) "Precession optomechanics," arXiv:1104.4839 [^]
The fig. 1 in it makes the matter conceptually so simple that the paper can be recommended to any mechanician for his general reading, and not only to a specialist in the field.
--Ajit
[E&OE]
In the literature, FEM has sometimes been characterized as a local approach, but IMO this needs to be corrected.
The piecewise continuous trial-functions of FEM can be looked at from two different viewpoints: