I just wanted to know if i can consider one part of a FE model as a meshless part and form the global stiffness matrix just by assembling the meshfree stiffness matrix corresponding to the meshfree zone and the FE stiffness matrix of the rest. And then apply the boundary conditions to the model and solve. I would use RKPM to generate the meshfree stiffness matrix.
1. Definition of nanocomposites Nanocomposites are a novel class of composite materials whose reinforcements have dimensions in the range of 1-100 nm. Although nanoscale reinforcements (or nanofillers) of nanocomposites have different kinds of fillers such as nanofibers, nanowires, nanotubes and nanoparticles etc, their mechanical behaviors have some common features.
Carbon nanotubes as strong fibers in CNT-composites are subjected to large deformations in radial direction. They provide strength as well as structural damping in the composite. Despite being strong in the axial direction, CNTs are rather soft in the radial direction.
can i now about the theoritical formul for natural frequency of leaf spring.
any document on manufracture of composite leaf spring
Many researchers have already used micromechanical modeling techniques such as Mori-Tanaka (M-T), Self-consistent methods and dilute inclusion models depending on volume fraction and shape of the inclusions, etc., to predict the overall mechanical properties of CNT/polymer composites. However, we know that at nano scales the phenomenological behavior of material is different in comparison with micro or macro scales. Although the effects of waviness, interactions, agglomeration, etc.
Hi everybody. My name is Ada. I am a new user on this forum.
I am working with microcantilevers (MCs). Recently I experienced lack of sensitivity. I use MCs coated with nanostructured gold and I use SAM to attach different biological molecules e.g. Protein A, IgG, antiIgG. Everything was working fine until recently.
Would enybody have any sugestions what might be wrong?
Thanks,
Ada
On Friday, April 25th, 2008, the 20th Annual Melosh Competition for the Best Student Paper in Finite Element Analysis was held at Duke University. The competition resulted in a tie between Ludovic Chamoin (of the University of Texas, Austin) and Irina Kalashnikova (of Stanford University). Here is a picture of the 2008 Melosh Medalists with the judges, Leo Franca and Nicolas Moes:
From L to R: Leo Franca, Ludovic Chamoin, Irina Kalashnikova, Nicolas Moes.
Here is a recent work on the Poisson's ratio of carbon nanotube sheet [1]. From the experimental results, the researchers found that the Poisson's ratio could change from 0.06 to -0.20 as the content of MWNTs increasing from 0~100%. The interesting zero Poisson's ratio and auxetic materials were thus found.
Ref. [1] Sign Change of Poisson's Ratio for Carbon Nanotube Sheets. Science 25 April 2008: 504-507
Ying Li
Department of Engineering Mechanics, Tsinghua University
I am working on crack propagation . I am trying to figure what factors should be taken into account when the crack is being propagated using XFEM.
I am especially interested to know what happens to the additional dof's corresponding to enriched nodes. Once the crack is propagated and crack tip is at new location , we add new dof's corresponding to enrichment functions , but what happens to the information stored by the dof's of previous enriched nodes,do we forget them altotgether , or do we map it to the new enriched nodes?
